Articles
- Small Business - Huge Risk
- Local Restaurant Suffers Heavy Fines
- The Form I-9
- Form I-9 Violations: Civil and Criminal Penalties
- Discrimination and Employment Verification Procedures
- Immigration Crackdown Goes After Employers by Susan Carroll - Houston Chronicle
- 652 Businesses Nationwide Being Served With Audit Notices Today - July 1, 2009
- Crackdown on Employers
- Worksite Enforcement
- Who is a Target for an ICE Inspection?
Small Business - HUGE Risk
To ICE, size doen't matter! In 2008, a family owned manufacturing company in Colorado was fined over $17,000.00 for Form I-9
violations. This company had NEVER HIRED AN ILLEGAL WORKER, they simply did not follow strict Form I-9 procedures. The company
employed approximately 15 people most of whom were family friends or acquaintences. At some point, the business owner, who was
responsible for hiring new employees, ran out of blank Forms I-9 and stopped completing them for new hires. He felt the forms were
unnecessary since he knew that everyone he hired was born in the United States.
In the spring of 2008, the business was visited by
an ICE officer who served a Notice of Inspection (NOI), requesting all Forms I-9 for current employees and all forms going back 3 years.
The company provided what forms they had however, many were missing. The company was fined $1,100 for each requested form they
could not provide. Of the Forms I-9 that were provided to ICE most had clerical errors that cost the company from $100-$1100 per
error. The company retained an attorney who tried to negotiate a smaller fine. The judge found that the company could not show a
"good faith" attempt to comply with the law and refused to reduce the fines. The company could not withstand both the cost of the
attorneys fees, court costs, and civil fines. The company filed bankruptcy shortly afterwards.
Top...
Local Restaurant Suffers Heavy Fines
In December 2008, a Denver restaurant was served a Notice of Inspection by ICE agents and was ultimately fined over $65,000 in
civil penalties for Form I-9 violations. The Notice of Inspection demanded all current employees Forms I-9 and approximately 325
former employees going back 3 years. The restaurant stored it's archived employee records in several off-site locations, including
the restaurant owner's basement! It took several restaurant managers and employees working nearly around the clock to meet the
3 day deadline imposed by ICE.
Most of the violations found by ICE auditors were clerical errors or incomplete forms. The
restaurant had employed several different hiring managers during the 3 year period and all apparently had very different training,
or no training, in the proper completion of the Form I-9. At some point, the hiring managers decided it was "okay" to make
photocopies of the work authorization and identity documents the new hires provided, staple them to a BLANK Form I-9, and store the
form in the personnel files. Each of these incomplete forms cost the company $1,000 in civil penalites! Ultimately, the restaurant
could not negotiate the fines with ICE because they had no corporate policy or plan for compliance concerning the Form I-9 and the
employment authorization verifcation process.
Top...
The Form I-9
Congress enacted the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA), requiring all employers to complete a Form I-9, Employment
Eligibility Verification, within 3 days of hiring a new employee. The purpose of the Form I-9 is to allow the employer to verify
the employee's identity and eligibility to work in the United States. EVERY PERSON HIRED MUST COMPLETE THE FORM I-9, REGARDLESS OF
THEIR NATIONAL ORIGIN, EVEN IF THE EMPLOYER IS CERTAIN THE NEW EMPLOYEE IS A U.S. CITIZEN.
The Form I-9 must be completed for each individual hired by the employer. The employer must:
1. Ensure the employee attests, under penalty of perjury, that he or she is authorized to accept employment in the United States;
2. Attest under penalty of perjury the employer has verified the employee's work authorization status by examining certain documents;
and
3. Retain the Forms I-9 and make them available within 3 days of a notice of inspection by certain government entities for 3 years
from the date of hire or for one year from the date of termination; whichever is later.
The new Form I-9, issued April 3, 2009 contains two affidavits made under penalty of felony perjury. Section 1 of the Form I-9 is an
affidavit made by the employee swearing that he or she is authorized to work in the United States. Section 2 of the Form I-9 is
an affidavit made by the employer swearing that he or she has examined the required original documents provided by the new employee
and the documents appear to be genuine and related to the individual who presented them.
If either of the affidavits are incomplete in any way (for example, the employee did not date the form), U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) cannot prosecute the employee for felony perjury because the affidavit is incomplete. Instead, the employer will be
harshly fined or charged with other criminal offenses if the two affidavits are not properly completed. The burden is on the
employer to properly complete, maintain, store, and purge the Form I-9 according to the law.
If an examination by the Department of Labor or ICE reveals the employer has failed to comply with its obligations under the
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 274A(b), the government may issue a "Notice of Intent to Fine". The fact that an employee
is a U.S. Citizen will not shield an employer from sanctions if the Form I-9 is not completed accurately nor will the size of the
business or the lack of administrative resources shield the employer from fines.
Top...
Form I-9 Violations: Civil and Criminal Penalties
INA Section 274A(e)(5) provides for civil penalties of $110 to $1,100 per deficient Form I-9 for employers who commit paperwork violations.
Form I-9 violations can include failure to sign the form, failure to complete the form in a timely manner, or failure to list the
appropriate work authorization and identity documents. Civil penalties for knowingly hiring or continuing to employee unauthorized
workers range from $275 to $2,200 per employee for the first violation and up to $11,000 per employee thereafter. Civil penalties
for accepting fraudulent documents may range from $250 to $2,000 per document for the first violation and up to $5,000 per document
thereafter. Violations of employment eligibility verification procedures risk fines of $100 to $1,000 per offense.
Criminal penalties for a pattern of knowingly hiring or continuing to employee unauthorized employees include up to six months in
jail and/or a fine of up to $3,000 per unauthorized employee. Employers found to be harboring unauthorized workers face up to five
years imprisonment for knowingly hiring ten or more unauthorized employees in a twelve-month period with actual knowledge that they
were brought into the United States illegally; up to ten years imprisonment for helping an unauthorized employee enter the country
illegally or harboring aliens for commercial advantage or financial gain.
There are both "technical/procedural" and "substantive" failures. Technical/procedural violation will usually cause fines toward
the lower end of the range of penalties. Substantive fines will be more expensive with fines in the upper range of the penalty
scale.
Top...
Discrimination and Employment Verification Procedures
When it comes to the Form I-9, E-Verify, and other employment eligibility verification procedures, employers must be aware that
certain practices may be considered discrimination.
The Office of Special Counsel for Immigration Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) in the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is
the agency that investigates charges of discrimination arising out of employment eligibility verification practices. Employers who
are determined to have unlawfully discriminated may be required to pay back wages and civil penalties and to hire or rehire workers.
The OSC will investigate claims of:
- Unfair Documentary Practices. The completion of the Form I-9 requires an employee to present certain specific documents to prove his
or her identity and eligibility to work in the Unites States. New hires have the right to choose which documents to present to the
employer. If the documents supplied by the employee appear to be reasonably valid and relate to the person who presented them,
an employer cannot lawfully request additional documents. If for example an employee certifies that he or she has permanent
residence status and provides a driver's license and social security card but not a permanent residence card (Green Card), it may
be considered abusive for the employer to insist on seeing the Green Card. Attempts to do so may result in governmental sanctions
against the employer for document abuse.
- Citizenship Status Discrimination. Requiring U.S. citizenship or permanent resident status is prohibited unless otherwise required
by law, regulation, or government contract. Refusing to hire asylees or refugees because employment authorization will end at a
specific date in the future is unlawful.
- National Origin Discrimination. It is unlawful to treat workers differently because of their place of birth, country of origin,
ancestry, native language, or accent.
- Retaliatory Discrimination. It is unlawful for an employer to intimidate, threaten, coerce, or retaliate against an employee who
files a discrimination charge, testifies, or assists an investigation or hearing, or asserts other rights under law.
Top...
The following article was written by SUSAN CARROLL in the HOUSTON CHRONICLE on July 1, 2009.
Immigration Crackdown Goes After Employers
Federal officials on Wednesday announced plans to audit the immigration and employment paperwork of 652 businesses across the country,
including 26 in Houston, marking a major increase in work site enforcement.
The initiative is part of a growing push to target employers who hire illegal immigrants, a centerpiece of President Barack Obama's
immigration enforcement strategy.
The number of I 9 audit notices delivered to employers Wednesday eclipsed the 503 issued all of last fiscal year, and signaled the
beginning of a "bold, new" ICE initiative, officials said Wednesday. The notices alert business owners that Immigration and Customs
Enforcement will be inspecting their hiring records, including employment eligibility verification forms known as I-9s.
John Morton, the assistant secretary for ICE, said in a statement that the nationwide effort is a "first step in ICE's long-term
strategy to address and deter illegal employment."
ICE officials said they could not provide names of companies that will be audited because they were selected based on tips and
information from investigations. A total of 111 of the targeted businesses are in Texas, said Gregory Palmore, an ICE spokesman
in Houston.
Palmore said about 60 percent of the Houston-area businesses targeted involved companies with fewer than 100 employees,
while the remainder involved larger companies. The companies fall into a wide range of categories, including manufacturing,
restaurants, construction and trucking, Palmore said.
Gordon Quan, a Houston immigration attorney and co-chairman of the firm Foster Quan, said the crackdown was expected inside
immigration circles.
"They're trying to establish that this administration isn't going to be rolling over and kowtowing to immigrants," he said.
"The focus is going to be on employers and stopping the magnet to bring people across the border."
A shift from the past
In April, the Obama administration announced new guidelines that increase the focus on employers who break the law. The guidelines
represent a significant shift from the past administration's work site enforcement strategy, which resulted in a series of
high-profile raids across the country in recent years, including in Houston, but relatively few employer arrests.
Mark Krikorian, executive director for the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington, D.C., think tank that supports
stricter immigration controls, called the audits a "step in the right direction."
"If they're not going to do raids, they can at least do this," he said. "It's incomplete, but at least it's part of the answer.
"If they keep it up, if it's not just a one-time publicity stunt, business across the country will sit up and take notice that
they could be next and they better clean up their acts," Krikorian said. "Not just with existing workers, but going forward with
new hires."
Krikorian questioned whether the audits may amount to a "spoonful of enforcement to make the amnesty go down."
The I 9 audits and investigations into suspected unscrupulous employers could help appease some critics in Congress who have said
they would oppose a legalization program for the estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. without first increasing
border and interior enforcement.
Beto Cardenas, a Houston attorney and executive counsel to Americans for Immigration Reform, a coalition of Houston businesses
lobbying for immigration reform, said the audits send the message that the government is serious about targeting the Form I-9 compliance problem.
"It's not something that's pretty, but it's part of interior enforcement," Cardenas said. "Now is this, as a standalone, the
complete solution? No. That's why you have to have broad immigration reform, so it's not a simple iron fist approach for employers
who were following the law as the law was written at the time."
Caught in a Catch-22
By law, employers must file I-9 forms for all new hires, including U.S. citizens. Employers are required to check the documents
that employees present as proof of legal eligibility and identification to make sure they "reasonably appear to be genuine,"
according to immigration officials.
Norman Adams, co-founder of Texans for Sensible Immigration Policy, a coalition of local businesses including contractors and
builders, said employers are caught in a Catch-22 when it comes to employee verification.
"If you're in the roofing business, if you're in the concrete business, you don't have American-born workers showing up at your
door," he said. "You have Hispanic workers showing up at your door, and they have what looks to be a legitimate Social Security card.
"And under our current law, if they have a card that looks legitimate and you don't hire them because you suspect they are illegal,
then you are guilty of discrimination" and could be investigated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Adams said.
"That's the current system," he said, "and it's broken."
susan.carroll@chron.com
Top...
652 Businesses Nationwide Being Served With Audit Notices Today
This information was released July 1, 2009 in a press release from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and reprinted
from www.ice.gov
WASHINGTON - U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is launching a bold, new audit initiative today by issuing Notices
of Inspection (NOIs) to 652 businesses nationwide - which is more than ICE issued throughout all of last fiscal year. The notices
alert business owners that ICE will be inspecting their hiring records to determine whether or not they are complying with
employment eligibility verification laws and regulations. Inspections are one of the most powerful tools the federal government
has to enforce employment and immigration laws. This new initiative illustrates ICE's increased focus on holding employers
accountable for their hiring practices and efforts to ensure a legal workforce.
"ICE is committed to establishing a meaningful I-9 inspection program to promote compliance with the law. This nationwide effort
is a first step in ICE's long-term strategy to address and deter illegal employment," said Department of Homeland Security Assistant
Secretary for ICE John Morton.
Employers are required to complete and retain a Form I-9 for each individual they hire for employment in the United States. This
form requires employers to review and record the individual's identity document(s) and determine whether the document(s) reasonably
appear to be genuine and related to the individual.
The 652 businesses being presented with a NOI today for a Form I 9 audit have been selected for inspection as a result of leads and
information obtained through other investigative means. Due to the ongoing, law enforcement sensitive nature of these audits, the
names and locations of the businesses will not be released at this time.
In FY 2008, ICE issued 503 similar notices throughout the year. In April, ICE implemented a new, comprehensive strategy to reduce
the demand for illegal employment and protect employment opportunities for the nation's lawful workforce. Under this strategy,
ICE is focusing its resources on the auditing and investigation of employers suspected of cultivating illegal workplaces by
knowingly employing illegal workers. The nationwide initiative being launched today is a direct result of this new strategy.
-- ICE --
Top...
Crackdown on Employers
LOS ANGELES -- A senior U.S. immigration official said Monday that his agency will intensify a crackdown on employers of workers in
the country illegally as part of the Obama administration's new immigration strategy.
John Morton, the new chief of U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, a unit of the Department of Homeland Security, said that the
agency is set to increase the number of companies it will audit and systematically impose fines on violators. Form I-9 Violations could also
lead to criminal charges, he said.
On July 1, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced an audit of employers to verify whether their employees were
eligible to work. Mr. Morton said that 654 companies are currently being audited and that many more employers will be notified
soon that they also will be under scrutiny by the government. "You are going to see audits regularly and on a larger scale,"
Mr. Morton said during a two-day visit to southern California, his first since being appointed four months ago. "You will see the
resuscitation of...civil fines."
Tom Roach, an immigration attorney in Pasco, Wash., said that apple, cherry and grape growers in his area are panicking over the
new crackdown. Few industries have come so close to admitting they cannot survive without the labor of illegal immigrants as
agriculture. At least half of the 1.8 million crop workers in the U.S. are undocumented.
Mr. Roach said a client who received a notification of inspection from ICE last month could face thousands of dollars in fines.
"There is a ton of counterfeit documents out there. The employer does exactly what he is supposed to do, but he can still get in
trouble," he said.
As part of the audit, immigration agents review the I-9 forms and other records of a company. If agents conclude that a business
knowingly hired illegal workers, criminal investigations follow.
On Monday, federal prosecutors filed charges against Bellingham, Wash.-based Yamato Engines Specialists where 28 people were arrested
in a February immigration raid, accusing the family-owned business of knowingly hiring illegal immigrants. The raid at Yamato was
the first since President Barack Obama took office and attracted national attention. Calls to Yamato Engine weren't immediately
returned Monday, the Associated Press reported.
Fines for companies found to employ workers in the country illegally could exceed $800 per employee. "You have to make sure that
the fine isn't just seen by these companies as part of their bottom line," said deputy ICE chief Alonzo Pena. Messrs. Morton and
Pena said the government would promote use by companies of an electronic employment verification system, known as the E-Verify system. The
system is voluntary in California and most states.
Enforcement activity during the Bush administration focused on high-profile raids in which thousands of illegal immigrants were
arrested and placed in deportation proceedings. Relatively few companies and their executives were prosecuted. The Obama
administration has made employers the cornerstone of its immigration policy. "If we are going to have serious change, we must
make sure the employer community is complying with the law," said Mr. Morton, referring to employers as the magnet that attracts
thousands of illegal workers to the U.S. each year.
About 11.5 million illegal immigrants live in the U.S., according to the Pew Hispanic Center, a nonpartisan research group. Without
illegal immigrants, business executives in industries like construction, lodging and agriculture say they would be forced to
radically change how they operate.
"I'm scared out of my wits," said Bob Brody, who farms 334 acres of organic apples and pears in Washington state. "I can't get
the bodies that I need to do the work because Congress refuses to pass immigration reform. Now I'm being asked by the government
to play cop. Can you imagine the stress that is going to cause a grower?"
Write to Miriam Jordan at miriam.jordan@wsj.com
Printed in The Wall Street Journal, August 18, 2009, page A3
Top...
Worksite Enforcement -
ICE Investigations Lead to Huge Fines and Arrests of Business Owners, Managers
and Supervisors
"Worksite enforcement actions target a key component of the illicit support structure that enables illegal immigration to flourish.
No employer, regardless of industry or location is immune from complying with the nation's laws. ICE and our law enforcement partners
will continue to bring all of our authorities to bear in this fight using criminal charges, asset seizures, administrative arrests
and deportations."
JulieL.Myers,
Assistant Secretary for Homeland Security,
U. S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) investigations are leading to huge fines and business owners, managers, and supervisors
being arrested and convicted for engaging in illegal employment practices. In April 2009, Secretary Napolitano issued guidance
outlining that ICE will focus its resources in the worksite enforcement program on the criminal prosecution of employers who knowingly
hire illegal workers in order to target the root cause of illegal immigration. ICE will continue to arrest and process for removal any
illegal workers who are found in the course of these worksite enforcement actions in a manner consistent with immigration law and DHS
priorities. ICE will use all available civil and administrative tools, including civil fines and debarment, to penalize and deter
illegal employment.
These recent actions are representative of the serious nature of ICE investigations. Employers must be aware that employment eligibility verification enforcement efforts
are intensifying and many businesses are being targeted.
Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation - July 7, 2009 U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Butler County Sheriff's
Office announced a $40,000 fine settlement reached with the Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corporation for violations of immigration laws.
ICE conducted an I-9 inspection of Krispy Kreme after receiving information from the Butler County Sheriff's Office which revealed
the company had employed dozens of illegal aliens at one of their doughnut factories in Cincinnati. "Employers have a responsibility
to hire men and women who are authorized to work in the United States and fines are an important component of ensuring their compliance,"
said Brian Moskowitz, special agent in charge of the ICE Office of Investigations in Michigan and Ohio. "ICE will use the legal tools
at its disposal to address those who neglect or falter in their corporate responsibilities." The audit also revealed violations to
the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Shipley Do-Nut Flour and Supply Company Inc. -On August 7, 2009 Shipley Do-Nut Flour and Supply Company was sentenced to be under
court supervision for a period of three years, pay a criminal fine of $250,000 and forfeit $1.334 million to U.S. Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) for harboring illegal aliens. The company, through its president Lawrence Shipley III, pleaded guilty to
conspiring to harbor illegal aliens in September 2008. The $1.334 million forfeited to the United States was paid in lieu of the
United States forfeiting the company's interest in various company-owned residences where illegal alien employees were housed during
the conspiracy. Warehouse managers Jimmy Rivera and Julian Garcia, and warehouse supervisor Christopher Halsey, all who had authority
to make managerial decisions including, but not limited to, hiring, job assignment and termination decisions for the company, also
pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of hiring or continuing to hire illegal aliens. All three men were sentenced to six months
probation and received fines in the amounts of $1,500, $2,000 and $1,000, respectively. Lawrence Shipley pleaded guilty Aug. 28, 2008
to continuing to hire illegal aliens and was sentenced to a similar probationary term and fined $6,000. The charges against the
company arise from a criminal investigation initiated by ICE in January 2008 which included interviews with former employees and
a thorough review and analysis of I-9 forms and Social Security Administration (SSA) No-Match letters. During an April 2008
enforcement action at the Houston-based company's facilities, ICE agents administratively arrested 27 illegal aliens employed by
the company, and who lived in company-provided housing located at or near the warehouse. ICE agents also recovered 42 No-Match
letters sent by the SSA which placed the company on notice that the aliens did not have valid Social Security numbers.
El Pollo Rico Restaurant - On July 24, 2008, the co-owner of El Pollo Rico Restaurant in Wheaton, Maryland, Francisco C. Solano,
pleaded guilty to conspiracy to harbor aliens, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and structuring bank transactions to evade
reporting requirements in connection with the operation of the restaurant. Solano's wife, Ines Hoyos-Solano, also pleaded guilty to
conspiracy to commit money laundering. According to his guilty plea, for eight years, Francisco Solano concealed illegal aliens in
residences and businesses they owned and rented in Wheaton and Kensington, Md. He paid the aliens in cash and accepted rent payments
in cash only. In addition, Francisco laundered the proceeds from the illegal employment of aliens. As part of the plea, Francisco
has agreed to forfeit nearly $7.2 million derived from the illegal activities, including 13 bank and investor accounts and seven
properties located in Maryland and Virginia. Ines Solano also agreed to forfeit more than $1.5 million in cash found in the bedroom
of her residence during a search. Both defendants also agreed to cooperate with the IRS in the assessment and collection of their
tax liabilities for the years 2000-2007. Both defendants face a maximum of 20 years in prison for the money laundering conspiracy.
In addition, Francisco Solano faces a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison for the harboring conspiracy and 5 years in prison for
structuring transactions to evade reporting requirements. Both will be sentenced in late November 2008. Consuelo Solano, 70, of
Arlington, Va., and her brother Juan Faustino Solano, 57, of Kensington, Md., pleaded guilty on June 12, 2008, to the money laundering
conspiracy, and Juan Solano also pleaded guilty to conspiracy to harbor aliens. Their sentencing is scheduled for late September
2008.>
Action Rags USA - The owner of Houston-based Action Rags USA and two managers were indicted July 31, 2008, on various charges of
violating federal immigration laws. Action Rags USA is an exporter and grader of used clothing. Mabarik Kahlon, 45, Valerie Rodriguez,
34, and Cirila Barron, 38, are all charged in count one of the indictment with conspiracy to harbor illegal aliens and to induce
illegal aliens to come to the United States. Count two of the indictment charges them with inducing aliens to enter the United States
for commercial advantage. Both counts carry a maximum term of 10 years imprisonment, a $250,000 fine or both. A third manager, Mayra
Herrera-Gutierrez, 32, was also charged with conspiracy to harbor illegal aliens and to induce illegal aliens to come to the United
States. ICE began its investigation into Action Rags in May 2007. The yearlong investigation revealed the company did not properly
complete the required I-9 forms to verify eligibility for employment. The investigation also determined that the company knowingly
hired illegal aliens, and reportedly paid them in cash until they were able to purchase fraudulent identity and social security cards
from local flea markets. The investigation ultimately led to ICE agents executing a search warrant at Action Rags. During the search
warrant execution, in June 2008, ICE agents administratively arrested more than 150 illegal aliens, most from Mexico, who were
discovered working at the plant. The indictment alleges that illegal aliens made up roughly 85 percent of the Action Rags workforce,
and that the defendants engaged in acts that openly flouted federal immigration law. Each defendant is presumed innocent unless
convicted through due process of law.
Agriprocessors, Inc. - ICE agents executed criminal and administrative search warrants May 12, 2008, at Agriprocessors, Inc., in
Postville, Iowa, arresting 389 illegal aliens. It was the most ever arrested in a single-site worksite enforcement operation.
Ultimately, 305 of those arrested were also convicted of criminal offenses including: identity theft, false use of a Social Security
number, illegal re-entry into the United States and other crimes. Two Agriprocessors supervisors were arrested July 3, 2008, and
charged with crimes that include aiding and abetting aggravated identity theft and encouraging aliens to reside illegally in the
United States. In August 2008, one of those supervisors pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy to hire illegal aliens and one count
of aiding and abetting the hiring of illegal aliens.
All employers should take steps to prepare their business for a visit from ICE. The best course of action any employer can take to
protect their company is to invest in expert advice concerning Form I-9 training and procedures. The cost of non-compliance is too
expensive to ignore.
Last Modified: Thursday, April 16, 2009 Top...
Who Is A Target for an ICE Inspection?
Who is a target for ICE inspection?
Every employer is a target. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has changed its focus in recent months from searching for
illegal worker during massive raids to inspecting employers I-9 documentation procedures instead. The enforcement division of DHS is
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, also known as ICE. ICE selects the businesses that will be targeted for inspection. Certain
industries may be under closer watch, such as construction, manufacturing, hotels and restaurants. However, all employers are
subject to inspection. ICE has stated that its new strategy is to build criminal cases against businesses suspected of hiring
undocumented immigrants before they raid workplaces.
How much does it cost?
Failing to comply with Form I-9 requirements, including improper completion or retention or failing to make forms available for
inspection can subject an employer to civil money penalties of $110 to $1,100 per violation with each improper form counting as a
separate violation
In addition, employers who knowingly hire or continue to employ unauthorized aliens who are or have become unauthorized to work
in the United States might be ordered to cease and desist from such activity. Also, they would pay a civil money penalty ranging
from $375 to $3,200 for each unauthorized alien for the first offense and up to the top penalty of $11,000 per unauthorized alien
for third and subsequent offenses.
What to do now?
Ensure hiring managers at your company are fully trained to complete the Form I-9 process accurately and completely. Employers are
required to have I-9 forms on file for every employee for 3 years after the date of hire or 1 year after the date of termination whichever
is a longer period of time.
Conduct an internal I 9 audit on an annual basis or hire an expert to complete the audit for you, to not only ensure all new forms are
completed correctly, but also to remove any I-9 forms that have reached their retention requirements and should be purged.
Use available resources to become familiar with documentation and retention requirements and properly correct any discovered issues.
I-9 Survival Guide has the latest resources available including the most current version of the Form I-9, instructions, and a
comprehensive step-by-step process to insure employers are 100% compliant and protected from the financial risk of non-compliance.
Following these proactive steps can insure you are correctly managing the employment eligibility verification process and safeguarding
your company in the event you are chosen by ICE in the next round of audits. Top...
The information provided in this website is not legal advice and should not be interpreted as legal advice.
This website is intended to provide a basic understanding of this information in summary form. This information
may not be comprehensive, is subject to change, and may not apply to all individual circumstances. Any information
received here should be confirmed with the appropriate government agencies or with an attorney, particularly as
it relates to your individual circumstances. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to be bound by our
Terms of Use. No client relationship is created by the provided content.
|